The exact number of QAnon adherents is unclear. In the following months, the QAnon neighborhood helped spread different rumors such because the “Frazzledrip” concept, which purported the existence of a “snuff” video showing Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin murdering a child, drinking her blood and taking turns carrying the pores and skin from her face as a mask. Maritime claims: This entry consists of the following claims, the definitions of which are excerpted from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which alone accommodates the complete and definitive descriptions: territorial sea – the sovereignty of a coastal state extends beyond its land territory and internal waters to an adjoining belt of sea, described as the territorial sea within the UNCLOS (Part II); this sovereignty extends to the air space over the territorial sea as well as its underlying s . In its choices relating to federal employees’ EEO claims, the Commission has concluded that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identification violates Title VII. 2022) (“Bostock held that the statute’s prohibition on employment discrimination ‘because of sex’ encompasses discrimination on the premise of sexual orientation and gender identity.”); Olivarez v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., 997 F.3d 595, 598 (5th Cir.
5 (citing Bostock and stating that “a transgender man who was harassed about his gender after popping out at work” was subjected to ““discrimination ‘because of sex’”); Roberts v. Glenn Indus. ‘because of sex’”); Sch. 37 Bostock itself concerned allegations of discriminatory discharge, but the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the choice about the character of discrimination based on sex logically extends to claims of harassment that change the phrases, circumstances, or privileges of employment below section 703(a)(1) of Title VII. In consequence, courts have readily found put up-Bostock that claims of harassment based on one’s sexual orientation or gender identification are cognizable beneath Title VII. 2021) (“Under Bostock v. Clayton County, discrimination on the premise of sexual orientation or gender id is a type of intercourse discrimination underneath Title VII.”). 2008) (holding that Title VII prohibits discrimination in opposition to a female employee as a result of she has had an abortion); Turic v. Holland Hosp., Inc., 85 F.3d 1211, 1214 (sixth Cir.
2013) (holding that Title VII prohibits discharging an worker as a result of she is lactating). 2017) (concluding that Title VII prohibits discrimination primarily based on breastfeeding); EEOC v. Hous. 2021) (stating that harassment on the idea of transgender identification is intercourse discrimination below Title VII as a result of “it is inconceivable to discriminate against an individual for being . Supreme Court’s holding in Bostock makes clear that a plaintiff may prove that very same-sex harassment is predicated on intercourse the place the plaintiff was perceived as not conforming to traditional male stereotypes.”); Doe v. City of Det., 3 F.4th 294, 300 n.1 (6th Cir. 2 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 17, 2021) (finding that the plaintiff had stated a declare for relief by alleging a hostile work environment primarily based on his heterosexual standing); Boney v. Tex. 5-eleven (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 6, 2020) (affirming jury verdict concerning a hostile work environment based mostly on religion where staff had been pressured to participate in “new age” religious activities at work against their needs). 2010) (stating that conduct that does not have sexual connotations can contribute to a sex-primarily based hostile work atmosphere). 28 See infra Example 35: Comparative Evidence Gives Rise to Inference that Harassment Is predicated on a Protected Characteristic (offering an example of facially sex-impartial offensive conduct motivated by intercourse, corresponding to bullying directed towards workers of 1 sex).
6, 2019) (denying abstract judgment to the employer on the plaintiff’s sexual harassment declare alleging that she was subjected to conduct that included comments from the plaintiff’s supervisor who, upon learning she was pregnant, told her “he was upset because he didn’t need anybody else to have her,” “made sexual hand gestures together with his smock in entrance of her and told her that she had ‘nice breasts’ that were ‘a nice measurement for sucking,’” stated she had a “fine sexy ass,” touched her, whispered in her ear, touched/grazed her buttocks, and confirmed her footage of himself partially undressed). 29 This doc does not analyze application of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act to harassment based mostly on an employee’s request for, or receipt of, an accommodation. 2002) (holding that the district court erred in granting judgment as a matter of law for the employer where sex-based mostly harassment consisted of repeated touching, vulgar feedback, propositions, and physical aggression). Ind. 2002) (discussing how employers’ “expectations” relating to alleged voluntary participation in religious actions can quantity to coercion). 1988) (“Protecting an employee’s proper to be free from pressured observance of the religion of his employer is at the guts of Title VII’s prohibition in opposition to religious discrimination.”); see additionally Garcimonde-Fisher v. Area203 Mktg., LLC, 105 F. Supp.